This Little Piggy Cried Wee Wee Wee… Part II

This Little Piggy Cried Wee Wee Wee… Part II

Reading Time: 6 minutes

The above image by Jeff Jacobs from Pixabay

In This Little Piggy Part I, I briefly examined marketing, promises of miracles, and the funds some of these New Apolostic Reformation (NAR) “ministries” collect. For example, Bethels School of Supernatural Ministry costs over 10k for the first two years. They promise you will embrace your royal identity and learn to walk in the authority and power of the King. If I had a gift from God to impart healing to others, I would be leaping from hospital to hospital, helping as many as possible. How is charging a fee to others for a supposed gift from God justifiable?

Is Impartation Biblical?

Bill Johnson claims to have had special revelations and prophetic words from God. His church has over 11,000 members, and they routinely promise discernment, fresh understandings, prophetic words, and healing. Not only for themselves, but the promise to become healers or prophets. Pivec wisely points out, “Thus, he redirects people’s attention away from Scripture (which is infallible) to his divinely channeled words (which he admits are fallible).1

Is impartation biblical? For example, can someone impart the gifts of healing, prophesy, words of knowledge, etc., to others? Several in my men’s group are moving in that direction after listening to Bill Johnson and Randy Clark.

Those in the (NAR) circles use several scriptures and events to support their views on healing, prophesy, words of knowledge, and impartation of gifts. Let’s examine several to see if they support the NAR view on gifts and gifting.

John 14:12 “Very truly I tell you, whoever believes in me will do the works I have been doing, and they will do even greater things than these, because I am going to the Father.” (NIV) is one that Bill Johnson, Randy Clark and others use to claim this generation of Christians will do greater miracles than Jesus.

Comparing Translations

Let’s look at some other translations of John 14:12

  • Truly, truly I say to you, the one who believes in Me, the works that I do, he will do also; and greater works than these he will do; because I am going to the Father. (NASB)
  • Most assuredly, I say to you, he who believes in Me, the works that I do he will do also; and greater works than these he will do, because I go to My Father. (NKJV)
  • I tell you the truth, anyone who believes in me will do the same works I have done, and even greater works, because I am going to be with the Father. (NLT)
  • I assure you: The one who believes in Me will also do the works that I do. And he will do even greater works than these, because I am going to the Father. (HCSB)

Notice all these translate the Greek word, erga as works. In fact, sixty of sixty-one versions cited on Bible Gateway, translate erga as works. The Living Bible is the only one that translates erga as miracles.2

The Passion Translation is another that translates erga as miracles, but Bible Gateway removed it two years ago. Many others have expressed concern about The Passion Translation, which I have written about before in Part I, Part II, and Part III. It is trendy in NAR circles, but it is not a translation; it is a paraphrase. Brian Simmons, the author of The Passion Translation, who has claimed to have visited Heaven’s Library, also adds the word “mighty” to the translation, further degrading an accurate translation.

NAR Miracles

Miracles are not the focus of John 14:12, but this is typical of those in the NAR circles. They take verses out of context and use them to suit their theology.

Current-day NAR apostles also claim that Romans 1:11 supports their belief that an apostle can impart gifts to his followers. Romans 1:11 reads, “I long to see you so that I may impart to you some spiritual gift to make you strong.” The Greek word used for gift is charisma, and it is never used to express in a limited fashion of what one man can give to another, but rather the gift of God’s grace. In the New Testament, it is used 17 times, 16 by Paul and once by Peter. It is not used to express gifts of the Spirit, but gifts of God’s grace in general.

And Paul certainly does not plan on exploiting them for the gifts he wants to share. In other words, Paul does not expect something in return, certainly not money for his gifts to the Roman church. Paul wants to serve them, minister to them, and bless them without the expectation of personal enrichment.

Finally, if you read further in Romans 12:6-8 you will find they already had the gifts, so why would he want to impart gifts they already had?

Paul and Timothy

Another verse used by the NAR apostles is 1 Timothy 4:14. They imply when the elders laid their hands on Timothy, he received his gift or gifts. It is important to remember that God chooses our gifts and the timing of those gifts. 1 Corinthians 12:28-31 You should not expect to attend a conference and walk away with the gift of prophecy, healing, knowledge, or discernment. The NAR pastors, teachers, and apostles do not distribute those gifts; only God does. Despite this, Randy Clark wrote, “I have a growing conviction that most of the Grace of God that will ever be given to us, is already in the earth today. Rather than coming from heaven itself, into our prayer closets, it is passed along from person to person throughout the Body of Christ. This is called impartation.”3

In the verse, Paul reminds Timothy of his gift, but Paul does not say the gift was received because of the laying of hands by the elders. The word Paul used ‘through’ (the Greek word for through is dia) is in the genitive form, not accusative.4 The genitive form tells us the laying on of hands along with the prophecy did not cause the gift. Nor is Paul saying those actions were/are necessary for believers to receive gifts from the Holy Spirit. James 1:17

Just Because You Want it…

Timothy’s gift was not the result of a conference in South America with Randy Clark or a weekend summit at Bethel Church in Redding with Bill Johnson and Chris Vallotton. Paul credits Eunice and Lois (Timothy’s mom and grandmother) with building his Godly heritage and foundation, which enabled him to receive gifts from the Holy Spirit.

Could God use others to impart gifts to others? Certainly, but Scripture does not support this theology of activation and impartation. The current circle of NAR churches and self-proclaimed apostles are, at the very least, suspicious of their claims, teachings, and motives.

The idea that we can impart, activate, or awaken gifts is not taught in the New Testament. They are not powers Christians can learn; they are gifts from the Holy Spirit, and Paul is clear not everyone who may want a particular gift can have it. 1 Corinthians 12:11 Are all teachers? Are all prophets? Are all healers? 1 Corinthians 12:29-30

It took Jesus three years to disciple his followers and for them to receive their gifts from the Holy Spirit. It is foolish to think a weekend seminar for $95 will result in the ability to heal, prophesy, have great faith, or discern spirits.

This Little Piggy Cried Wee Wee Wee…Part II © 2024 by James Glazier is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 

  1. Pivec, Holly. Gievett, Douglas R. “Evaluating Bethel Teachings.” Reckless Christianity, Cascade Books, 2023, pg. 180 []
  2. Pivec, Holly. Gievett, Douglas R. “Evaluating Bethel Teachings.” Reckless Christianity, Cascade Books, 2023, pgs. 164-165 []
  3. Budiselic, Ervin. Biblical Institute, Zagreb, June 2011, pg. 249,the%20laying%20on%20of%20hands []
  4. Budiselic, Ervin. Biblical Institute, Zagreb, June 2011, pg. 258,the%20laying%20on%20of%20hands []
This Little Piggy Cried Wee Wee Wee… Part II

This Little Piggy Cried Wee Wee Wee…Part I

Reading Time: 7 minutes

Above image by Jeff Jacobs from Pixabay

Claims of Miracles

Last year, the leaders of the James River Church in Missouri claimed that hundreds of healings took place during the “Week of Power” conference hosted by their church. This conference featured “apostles” Bill Johnson and Randy Clark from Bethel Church in Redding, California.

One of the many claims was by Kristina Dines (aka Krissy Thompson), who had three toes amputated years ago. The “apostle” Bill Johnson from Bethel Church asked if anyone needed/wanted a creative miracle in their life. Dines said she did, and after several prayed for her, she claims her toes grew back.

Claims like these need proof, especially for a natural skeptic like me. Someone who questioned the claims made by the Pastor (John Lindell) of James River Church created a website titled Show Me The Toes. There, you can view several short videos concerning these individuals’ claims.

John Lindell and Bill Johnson did not provide proof to those who questioned the validity of her miracle claim. John Lindell explained they were not giving legitimate evidence because they wanted to “protect” Kristina, reasoning they were more interested in guarding Kristina than providing proof to skeptics.

I think of the story in Mark 2:1-12 when Jesus returned to Capernaum. The number of people was so large friends of the paralyzed man opened a hole in the roof to lower him down to Jesus. Jesus said to the paralyzed man your sins are forgiven. Of course, the skeptics in the crowd were thinking that no one could forgive sins but God. What did Jesus do? He provided evidence.

If they were so concerned about protecting Kristina, they should not have released her claims publicly in the first place. If you watch her public video, she has no problem making the claim herself and does not seem concerned about sharing it with others while being recorded.

Modern Day Apostles

This past month, someone I know flew to South America to participate in an evangelical healing seminar organized by Randy Clark in the hopes he would return with the gift of healing and be able to impart that gift to others.

Randy Clark is an *Apostle* with Bill Johnson and Chris Vallotton at Bethel Church in Redding, California. He is also the founder and president of Global Awakening, a worldwide ministry that offers mission trips all over the world. Global Awakening also provides a school of ministry, training in physical healing, prophecy, deliverance, and spiritual warfare. They also have conferences worldwide and in the U.S. for those seeking anointing, impartation, more power, more gifts, and influence from the Holy Spirit. Their opening invitation to all believers reads, “For all believers everywhere, Global Awakening presents an opportunity to receive power from God.” Of course, these advertised powers don’t come free. Many of these conferences, classes, and lectures cost to attend and often accompany books and other materials to purchase and study. 

Bethel Church, Global Awakening, James River Church, and many others fall into the category of New Apolostic Reformation (NAR) churches. Got Questions defines it this way, “The New Apostolic Reformation, or NAR, is an unbiblical religious movement that emphasizes experience over Scripture, mysticism over doctrine, and modern-day ‘apostles’ over the plain text of the Bible.”1

Dancing With The Stars

In her book Total Truth Liberating Christianity from Its Cultural Captivity, Nancy Pearcey addresses the celebrity style of some popular evangelical preachers. She explains how evangelists in the past earned their authority by going through the long and arduous process of studying, training, and certification. Once ordained by their particular religious body of leaders, they stepped out to serve their respective congregations and local communities. Pearcey writes, “But the leaders of the populist evangelical movement made an end run around denominational structures and built movements based on sheer personality, on their ability to move people and win their confidence.”2

Author of Another Gospel and The Deconstruction of Christianity, Alisa Childers, pointed out that, to a large degree, the current evangelical culture has become fixed on personalities and not the Gospel. We are all drawn to natural leaders who are strong, outspoken, articulate, powerful, and charismatic. We tend to isolate what they are saying in snippets, ignoring the context and detachment from the Word. Childers writes, “These rationalizations send wounded sheep into the arms of progressive Christianity, where they will be validated and accepted. But ultimately they will be left to bleed out, like someone who goes to the doctor to be treated for a flesh wound, only to be given a hug and some comforting words, rather than stitches and antibiotics.”3

For Only $9.99

Some friends recently mentioned the “Open Heavens 2024” conference, which will be held at Bethel’s College View Campus this September.

I took a peek and found the cost for the in-person experience is $195 and $149 for the Online experience.

From there, I looked at other conferences they were holding at Bethel. In June, they held the BraveCo Conference for men. The cost is also $195 for an in-person experience.

If you attend, they promise a “Fresh Encounter with the Holy Spirit,” and you will reconnect to the plans He has for your life. It reminds me of Jeremiah 29:11: “For I know the plans I have for you,” declares the Lord, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.” It is one of the most abused and misused bible verses.

Just six verses later, you never hear anyone claim Jeremiah 29:17-18 “Yes, this is what the Lord Almighty says: “I will send the sword, famine and plague against them and I will make them like figs that are so bad they cannot be eaten. I will pursue them with the sword, famine and plague and will make them abhorrent to all the kingdoms of the earth, a curse and an object of horror, of scorn and reproach, among all the nations where I drive them.”

At the BraveCo Conference, they also promise, “You will implement a powerful battle plan to win at life.”

$195 is not much to encounter the Holy Spirit and to win at life. I am unclear by what they mean by “win at life,” but whatever it is, it sounds better than losing at life. For some, that cost would simply entail giving up on Starbucks for a month. Does scripture promise we will win at life? John 16:33 suggests otherwise. I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world.

Read Acts 8, we find Simon the magician offering the apostles money for their ability. How did Peter respond? “May your money perish with you, because you thought you could buy the gift of God with money! You have no part or share in this ministry, because your heart is not right before God. Repent of this wickedness and pray to the Lord in the hope that he may forgive you for having such a thought in your heart. For I see that you are full of bitterness and captive to sin.” Acts 8:20-23

Your Best Life Now As a Prophet

In August, they have five days at the School of Prophets. Your school experience will include “Transformative insights and experiences to enhance your prophetic journey.” All for only $425. Considering the demanding and difficult lives of Biblical Prophets, this sounds like quite the deal. For example, Isaiah was sent to people who heard but never understood. Isaiah 6:9. Ezekiel dealt with rebellious people. Ezekiel 12:2 A queen wanted to kill Elijah. 1 Kings 19:2 Jeremiah was thrown down into a cistern. Jeremiah 38:6 Stephen asked in the book of Acts before he was stoned to death if there was ever a prophet they (the Jews) did not persecute. Acts 7:52 Finally, Jesus said of the people in Jerusalem as those “who kill the prophets and stone those sent.” Luke 13:344

Scripture warns us about false apostles, for example, Matthew 7:15 and Matthew 24:11. One of the warnings you find in 2 Corinthians 2:17Unlike so many, we do not peddle the Word of God for profit. On the contrary, in Christ we speak before God with sincerity, as those sent from God.”

Peddling the Word for profit is precisely what many of these apolistic churches are doing. They offer new experiences, new revelations, gifts of prophecy, gifts of healing, words of knowledge, encounters with the Holy Spirit, and so much more.

The entire book of Jude is dedicated to helping Christians watch out for, recognize, and avoid false teachers and their deceitful words. If you read the New Testament, you will find twenty-two of the twenty-seven books that warn us about false teachers.5 A few examples can be found in the following:

2 Timothy 4:3-4
2 Peter 3:16-17
2 Peter 2:1
Jude 1:4-8
Matthew 24:24
2 Timothy 4:3-4
Acts 20:28-30
1 John 4:1

Remember, the progressive Gospel NAR churches offer is Jesus + new knowledge + money. This new knowledge often comes at a cost, not only spiritually, but monetarily.

This Little Piggy Cried Wee Wee Wee… by James Glazier is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0


  1. “New Apostolic Reformation.” N.D. []
  2. Pearcey, Nancy. “When America Met Christianity-Guess Who Won?” Total Truth, Crossway, 2004, pg. 287 []
  3. Childers, Alisa. “Fixing What Isn’t Broken.” Another Gospel, Tyndale Momentum, 2020, pg. 46 []
  4. “What was a prophet in the Old Testament.” []
  5. Childers, Alisa. “Nothing New Under The Sun.” Another Gospel, Tyndale Momentum, 2020, pgs. 100-102 []
Stop! Consider What Is Wrong With The Passion Translation – Part III

Stop! Consider What Is Wrong With The Passion Translation – Part III

Reading Time: 8 minutes

The above image by Smiling Pixell from Pixabay


Ties To The New Apostolic Reformation

The Passion Translation has ties to the New Apostolic Reformation, which several biblical scholars have pointed out. Andrew Wilson, a teaching pastor with degrees in history and theology from Cambridge, explains greetings in Scripture are straightforward to translate. He says, “…virtually all the major translations render Philippians 1:1 pretty much the same way: “Paul and Timothy, servants of Christ Jesus.” But TPT throws in at least two ideas that fit the agenda of the version, but appear nowhere in the text: “My name is Paul and I’m joined by my spiritual son Timothy, both of us passionate servants of Jesus, the Anointed One.”1 So let’s continue looking at the translations I have used in this series of posts comparing The Passion Translation to the NIV, NASB, and the KJV.

Philippians 1:1

The NIV saysPaul and Timothy, servants of Christ Jesus, To all God’s holy people in Christ Jesus at Philippi, together with the overseers and deacons:

The NASB saysPaul and Timothy, bond-servants of Christ Jesus, To all the saints in Christ Jesus who are in Philippi, including the overseers and deacons:

The KJV saysPaul and Timotheus, the servants of Jesus Christ, to all the saints in Christ Jesus which are at Philippi, with the bishops and deacons:

TPT saysMy name is Paul and I’m joined by my spiritual son Timothy, both of us passionate servants of Jesus, the Anointed One.

Furthermore, Wilson explains in the very next verse where Paul says, “Grace and peace to you,” The Passion Translation reads, “We decree over your lives the blessings of divine grace and supernatural peace.”1 The artistic license Simmons takes with his Passion Translation would make Bob Ross proud. Andrew Wilson identifies multiple mistranslations, insertions, and additions that don’t even come close to the original text. 

Dr. Shead alluded to how Simmons slips in the prophetic to appeal to those within the NAR circles. Shead explains the translations of Syriac and Greek in the footnotes are incorrect. Shead writes, “Simmons renders ‘word’ in Psalm 119:11 as ‘prophecies’, claiming that this is translated from the Septuagint. The Greek word in question (λόγιον) means ‘word’, ‘teaching’ or ‘saying’; thrice in the Bible it means ‘oracle’. But in Psalm 119 it is a key term meaning ‘word’ or ‘promise’ – and this is how Simmons translates all 18 other cases in this psalm where the Septuagint has λόγιον. It appears that he was just looking for an excuse to slip prophecy in, despite the fact that the Psalm celebrates God’s written word, not the spoken oracles he gave his prophets.”2

God’s language of love in Scripture is not hiding. What He has done for us is spelled out plainly, and Simmons, with his visions and visitations, is not needed to expose ‘the secrets’ that supposedly hide within Scripture; because there are none. Scripture is compiled of figurative language, narrative, history, poetry, letters, prophecy, and oratory language, all of which are ways God has used to express his neverending grace, mercy, and love for us. 

Dr. Michael Rydelnik points out, “Brian Simmons holds to an egalitarian view of men and women in ministry and marriage, and his paraphrase reinterprets the meaning of the words to reflect his own view. He also repeatedly uses words and phrases that are significant in the hyper-charismatic world, even when they’re not in the text of Scripture.”3


One notable blogger, Dr. Paul Ellis, who endorses The Passion Translation, says, “There are plenty of critical reviews pointing out what TPT gets wrong, so let me point out some things it gets right.”4 Concerning John 15:2, Dr. Ellis explains that Jesus does not remove unfruitful branches, but He lifts them up. Sure, there are many passages Simmons gets correct, but I have to ask, why would I want to read a bible with errors, or even numerous errors? 

Dr. Ellis continues concerning John 15:2, “If you are an unfruitful Christian, would you rather hear [emphesis mine] that Jesus plans to cut you off and take you away (something he never said) or that he will lift you up? Bad translations hurt people; good ones encourage them to trust Jesus.”5

Frankly, who cares about what you would ‘rather hear’? Reading Scripture is not an exercise in subjectivism. What is important is what the author is trying to communicate. Don’t read the word to chase the next emotional high or find the next spiritual encounter; those will come naturally. I don’t read the word to feel good; I read the word to understand God. 

If you read the word, flipping through the pages to find something that will confirm a desire you have been praying about or to find a passage that jumps out at you, and you take it as a sign from God, you are going about it all wrong. This method is a favorite pass time of many Christians, but it is seriously flawed. 

It could be Dr. Ellis is pointing out you attract more flies with honey rather than a fly swatter. I get that; nevertheless, The Passion Translation is not something I will read or recommend to new or even experienced Christians. 

Another blogger Margaret Mowczko believes this newer interpretation of John 15:2 is more appealing to this generation but questions if that is true.

She explains, “The main reason is a reluctance, even a ‘terror’ as someone told me, of accepting the idea that a branch may be removed from the Vine―cut off from Jesus―due to a lack of productivity. And this removal appears to go against the theology of eternal security, or ‘once saved, always saved.’6

She continues, “… Jesus’s statements about the unproductive branches, and similar statements in the Gospels, were deliberately designed to be startling and sobering so that hearers would pay attention and assess their hearts and their actions.”6 She rightfully points out that Jesus often used hyperbole to shock and get the attention of his listeners. She feels He intended to provoke an action, not to be a statement on the doctrine of salvation, once saved, always saved. 

He Is More Than Love

I think of the popular Christian artist and musician Zach Williams, whose music I thoroughly enjoy, but he has a line in his popular song, Heart of God, that is misleading. “There’s only love in the heart of God.” So many Christians can’t fathom a God or don’t want to consider a God that has other characteristics. Characteristics that make some Christians uncomfortable. 

They certainly don’t want to think of a God with righteous anger, jealousy, wrath, or vengeance. Or a God that demands us to hate. Psalm 97:10 So many Christians have this ‘Precious Moments Figurine‘ picture of God, sugar and spice and everything nice. Yet, Scripture makes it quite clear it is terrifying to fall into the hands of our living God. Hebrews 10:31

Yes, He is loving, 1 John 3:1, but he has other attributes. 

  • He is giving John 3:16 
  • He is caring Matthew 6:26 
  • He is merciful Ephesians 2:4-5 
  • He is righteous Psalm 145:17 
  • He is just Psalm 89:14

Thankfully, the righteousness and justice He has, and demands we have, He provides through His Son Jesus. Because, without Jesus, this does not end well. Matthew 25:41. Ya, you never hear love songs about the goats and the roasting they receive. 

Brian Simmons describes his Passion Translation as a ‘heart-level’ translation (whatever that means) using Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic manuscripts,’ which ‘expresses God’s fiery heart of love, merging emotion and life-changing truth, and unfolds the deep mysteries of the Scriptures in the love language of God.’7

This supposed translation is backed by several Christian leaders, including Bill Johnson of Bethel Church and Hillsong’s Bobbie Houston. Some compare it to the Message Bible, but the numerous additions, subtractions, and alterations without explanations should steer thoughtful Christians away from this reading.8

Should you read The Passion Translation? I’m not. If you do, never use it as a main course. Instead, it would be best to question what you read by comparing it to other solid and reliable translations. 

Brian Simmon’s intentions may have been honorable initially, but he has taken an artistic license with Scripture that all Christians should be critical of. His supposed ‘heart-level’ translation often appeals to those driven by feelings and emotions. Some think if the feelings are absent, then something is wrong, yet that can be part of a Christian’s walk. Psalm 13:1 Psalm 83:1 Job 30:20

Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance. – George Bernard Shaw

The plea of good intentions is not one that can be allowed to have much weight in passing of historical judgment upon a man whose wrong-headedness and distorted way of looking at things produce, or helped to produce, such incalculable evil – Theodore Roosevelt

To summarize my main points in all three posts:

  • Brian Simmons does not have a ‘real’ doctorate from an accredited university. 
  • The early translations of his Passion Translations were by Simmons alone. It was only after many theologians were publicly critical of his work that he added some other translators. 
  • Most modern, actual translations, have over 100 PhDs as contributors, editors, and authors. For example, my ESV has over 120 Ph.Ds. contributors listed, all from accredited universities. 
  • Simmons relied primarily on Aramaic, not Greek.3
  • It is abundantly clear Simmons adds words and phrases that are not in the original text. 
  • Simmons had visits 1 & 2 from Jesus himself, then visions where he visited heaven’s library where Jesus promised him a book of the Bible (John 22) that he alone would receive and have knowledge of to share with others. 
  • Simmons has never offered any explanation for the changes in his new editions. Nor will he sit in the ‘hot seat’ and be interviewed by serious and legitimate theologians that are critical of his work. 
  • Bible Gateway is no longer using The Passion Translation. 
  • Littered with words and phrases, The Passion Translation amplifies emotions and feelings to appeal to those in the NAR circles and those chasing the next experience.

What do you aim for when reading Scripture? Do you have a purpose or objective? What is your intent? Is it to know and understand God in a more accurate and truthful way? I would hope so. If that is the case, I would ask, would you purchase an inaccurate gun if you wanted to do some target shooting? Of course not; you would want a weapon that was as accurate as possible. So why would you then purchase and read a supposed translation that was highly inaccurate and often gives you a false picture of God, his disciples, and their world 2000 years ago? Put away your Passion Translation and aim true. 

I suggest you read these reviews of The Passion Translation: 
The Gospel Coalition  
Dr. Lionel Windsor’s 
Alisa Childers 
Dr. Michael Rydelnik
Holly Pivec’s

Full Interview with Sid Roth

Recommended Books:
A New Apostolic Reformation
God’s Super-Apostles 

Creative Commons License
Stop! Consider What Is Wrong With The Passion Translation – Part III by James W Glazier is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at

  1. Wilson, Andrew. “What’s Wrong With The Passion ‘Translation’?” Think Theology,, 6 Wednesday, 2016, [] []
  2. Shead, Andrew, G. “Burning Scripture with Passion: A Review of The Psalms (The Passion Translation).” The Gospel Coalition,, April 2018, []
  3. Rydelnik, Michael. “The Problems with the Passion Translation.” Dr. Michael Rydelnik,, 14 January 2023, 18 March 2023. [] []
  4. Ellis, Paul. “Paul’s Review of The Passion Translation.” Escape to Reality, 9 Feb. 2022, Accessed March 1. 2023. []
  5. Ellis, Paul. “Paul’s Review of The Passion Translation.” Escape to Reality, 9 Feb. 2022, Accessed March 1 2023. []
  6. Mowczko, Margaret. “Are the branches lifted up or taken away in John 15:2a?” Marg Mowczko Exploring the biblical theology of Christian egalitarianism,, September 1, 2022. [] []
  7. “Bible Gateway Removes the Passion Bible Translation from Its Site – Premier Christian News: Headlines, Breaking News, Comment & Analysis.” Premier Christian News, Premier Christian News, February 10 2022, []
  8. “Bible Gateway Removes the Passion Bible Translation from Its Site – Premier Christian News: Headlines, Breaking News, Comment & Analysis.” Premier Christian News, Premier Christian News, February 10, 2022, []
Stop! Consider What Is Wrong With The Passion Translation – Part III

Stop! Consider What Is Wrong With The Passion Translation – Part II

Reading Time: 6 minutes

The above image by Smiling Pixell from Pixabay

In Part I, I touched on the background of Brian Simmons and what goes into reliable translations. Below I will give you specific examples of The Passion Translation (TPT) compared to the New International Version (NIV), New American Standard Bible (NASB), or the King James Version (KJV), so you can decide for yourself. 

Comparing Translations

Ephesians 6:10.

The NIV saysFinally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power.

The NASB saysFinally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of His might.

The KJV saysFinally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.

TPT says: Now my beloved ones, I have saved these most important truths for last: Be supernaturally infused with strength through your life-union with the Lord Jesus. Stand victorious with the force of his explosive power flowing in and through you. ((Simmons, Brian. “Psalm 57.” The Passion Translation 2020 Edition, BroadStreet Publishing, 2020, p.525))

Andrew Shead, head of the Old Testament department at Moore Theological College, holds a Ph.D. at Cambridge and has earned a Bachelor of Science, Bachelor of Theology, and Masters of Theology, says, “Brian Simmons has made a new translation of the Psalms (and now the whole New Testament) which aims to ‘re-introduce the passion and fire of the Bible to the English reader.’ He achieves this by abandoning all interest in textual accuracy, playing fast and loose with the original languages, and inserting so much new material into the text that it is at least 50% longer than the original. The result is a strongly sectarian translation that no longer counts as Scripture; by masquerading as a Bible it threatens to bind entire churches in thrall to a false god.”1

Psalm 57:1

The NIV saysHave mercy on me, my God, have mercy on me, for in you I take refuge. I will take refuge in the shadow of your wings until the disaster has passed.

The NASB saysBe gracious to me, O God, be gracious to me, For my soul takes refuge in You; And in the shadow of Your wings I will take refuge Until destruction passes by.

The KJV saysBe merciful unto me, O God, be merciful unto me: for my soul trusteth in thee: yea, in the shadow of thy wings will I make my refuge, until these calamities be overpast.

TPT saysPlease, God, show me mercy! Open your grace-fountain for me, for you are my soul’s true shelter. I will hide beneath the shadow of your embrace, under the wings of your cherubim, until this terrible trouble is past. 

You use a hyphen to form a compound adjective before a noun. After researching, and

I don’t see anything relating to a grace-fountain. Nor do I see cherubim in the text. 

Brian Simmons may have good intentions (frankly, I find that dubious), but his methods are questionable, to put it mildly. The Passion Translation is not a translation you can trust, consider reliable, or be faithful to the author’s intent to share the word of God. 

Galatians 2:19

The NIV says: For through the law I died to the law so that I might live for God.

The NASB says: For through the Law I died to the law, so that I might live to God.

The KJV says: For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God.

TPT says: For through the law I died to the law, so that I might live to God [in heaven’s freedom] 2 Note the updated version has changed by dropping, “in heaven’s freedom.” No explanation in the footnotes as to why this newer version has changed. 

Dr. Andrew Wilson, who has ‘real‘ degrees in theology and history from Cambridge, wrote concerning the early editions of The Passion Translation, “…in Galatians 2:19, hina theō zēsō, which simply means ‘that I might live for God’, has been ‘translated’ as ‘so that I can live for God in heaven’s freedom’. To be clear: there is no indication whatsoever in the Greek of that sentence, or the rest of the chapter, that either heaven or its freedom are in view in this text.”3

Wilson continued to explain TPT is not a translation. He said Simmons is adding to Scripture and pointed out what Revelation 22:18-19 has to say about Christians who do this. 

Mark 1:15

The NIV says: “The time has come,” he said. “The kingdom of God has come near. Repent and believe the good news!”

The NASB says: and saying, “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel.”

The KJV says: And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.

TPT says“At last the fulfillment of the age has come! It is time for the realm of God’s kingdom to be experienced in fullness! Turn your lives back to God and put your trust in the hope-filled gospel!”

It is clear that Simmons is adding to the original words of Scripture. 

According to Got Questions, “The additions in The Passion Translation are justified with the claim that this translation ‘enhances [the Bible’s] meaning by going beyond a literal translation to magnifying God’s original message.'”4

No Explanations

Psalm 18:1

The NIV saysI love you, Lord, my strength.

The NASB saysI love you, O Lord, my strength.

The KJV saysI will love thee, O Lord, my strength.

TPT saysLord, I passionately love you. I want to embrace you, for now you’ve become my power!

Simmons has made many changes to his first and subsequent editions but has yet to offer any explanations. Consequently, you will find nothing in his footnotes or any online explanations of these changes. 

Dr. Shead also writes, “Simmons seems as uninterested in linguistic accuracy as he is in textual accuracy. He searches the dictionary, and sometimes apparently his imagination, for ways to insert new ideas that happen to align with his goals, regardless of their truthfulness.”1

Athanasius, born around 300 AD and an early defender/apologist of orthodox Christianity, wrote a warning about what Simmons does in his Passion Translation, “There is, however, one word of warning needed. No one must allow himself to be persuaded, by any arguments whatever, to decorate the Psalms with extraneous matter or make alterations in their order or change the words themselves.”5

In their book, God’s Super-Apostles, Douglas Geivet, a legitimate professor at Biola University, and Holly Pivic point out The Passion Translation completely rewords verses making them appear to support the New Apolostic Reformation (NAR). For example, in the Passion Translation, Galatians 6:6 says there is a transference of anointing between teachers, prophets, and their followers. It says, “And those who are taught the Word will receive an impartation from their teacher; a transference of anointing takes place between them.”6 This is just one example of a translation Simmons used to correlate with the NAR doctrine where this ‘transference of anointing’ is taught and endorsed. 

“Unfortunately, The Passion Translation (TPT) shows little understanding, either of the process of textual criticism, or of the textual sources themselves.”1

Christians are often sucked in by the experience and led down a path that leads away from the truth. Words like supernatural, explosive, power, flowing, infused, union, victorious, force, grace-fountain, embrace, soul-shelter, experience, and fullness, are littered like breadcrumbs for the wayward traveler to follow. The Passion Translation often resonates with the Christian seeking the ‘next experience,’ but they are being misled. Thinking they have found a way home and a path that sings to their soul, but instead, the course is twisted, and the song is deceptive.

1 John 4:1

2 Peter 1:20-21

Discernment is not a matter of simply telling the difference between right and wrong; rather it is telling the difference between right and almost right. – Charles Spurgeon

This is a time when all of God’s people need to keep their eyes and their Bibles wide open. We must ask God for discernment as never before. – David Jeremiah


Creative Commons License
Stop! Consider What Is Wrong With The Passion Translation Part II by James W Glazier is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  1. Shead, Andrew, G. “Burning Scripture with Passion: A Review of The Psalms (The Passion Translation).” The Gospel Coalition,, April 2018, [] [] []
  2. Simmons, Brian. “Psalm 57.” The Passion Translation 2020 Edition, BroadStreet Publishing, 2020, p.503 []
  3. Wilson, Andrew. “What’s Wrong With The Passion ‘Translation’?” Think Theology,, 6 Wednesday, 2016, []
  4. “What is the Passion Translation of the Bible?” []
  5. ‘The Letter of St. Athanasius to Marcellinus on the Interpretation of the Psalms,’ in St. Athanasius on the Incarnation: The Treatise de incarnatione verbi Dei, ed. and trans. A Religious of CSMV, 2nd ed. (London: Mowbray, 1953), 116. []
  6. Geivett, Douglas. Pivec, Holly. “NAR Prophets vs. Prophets in the Bible.” God’s Super-Apostles, Weaver Book, 2014. []
Stop! Consider What Is Wrong With The Passion Translation – Part III

Stop! Consider What Is Wrong With The Passion Translation – Part I

Reading Time: 5 minutes

The above image by Smiling Pixell from Pixabay

Brian Simmons is the founder of Stairway Ministries in Wichita, Kansas, and also an ‘apostle’ under the apostle Che’ Ahn with Harvest International Ministry. And you thought there were only 12 apostles. Simmons also worked for eight years in Panama as a church planter and Bible Translator, but is now the lead translator and author of the Passion Translation.1

Presently Simmons has translated the entire New Testament along with Psalms, Proverbs, and Son of Songs. He earned his doctorate with the Wagner Leadership Institute specializing in prayer. That’s who I want to pray for me! However, I’ll point out the Wagner Leadership Institute (now called Wagner University) is not an accredited seminary or Bible college that offers academic courses on the Bible or Theology. But this so-called university teaches courses on being apostles, prophets, and miracle workers. That is a red flag for me!1

A God-Given Mission

This duty, mission, and assignment to write the Passion Translation, he claims, came directly from God. View this 40-second clip where he claims on the Sid Roth show that Jesus commissioned him to write the Passion Translation.  That should raise some concerns. 

Brian Simmons said, “Jesus Christ came into my room. He breathed on me. And he spoke to me and said, ‘I’m commissioning you to translate the Bible into the translation project I am giving you to do.’ And he promised he would help me, and he promised me he would give me secrets of the Hebrew language. And I felt downloads coming; instantly I received downloads. It was like I got a chip put inside of me. I got a connection inside of me to hear him better. To understand the scriptures better, and hopefully to translate.”2

In the same interview, Simmons claims that Jesus showed him a new book of the Bible titled John 22. I can only imagine when he and his team of experts have completed translating the Bible, they will then be adding the new book to Scripture, which has been ‘endorsed’ by Jesus himself. Revelation 22:18-19

For the full 30-minute interview with Sid Roth, go here

Adding To Scripture

It is not a translation, and to suggest it, is misleading. When scholars work on translating, they convey the information as best they can to the original meaning. Some translations work toward accurate word-for-word translations (KJV or the NASB). In contrast, others work toward a thought-for-thought and look to share the sense of what the author wanted to communicate in the current language and culture (NIV).

Another point, the Passion Translation inserts and adds words, ideas, and concepts that have no attachment to the original Greek. Brian Simmons, the author of the Passion Translation, inserts the footnote, “implied by the context.” throughout his translation to cover his bases.3

The NIV translation took over ten years and had over 100 scholars to complete. “…another team of five Bible scholars reviewed their work, carefully comparing it to the original biblical text and assessing its readability. From there, each book [of the Bible] went to a general committee of 8 to 12 scholars. As part of the final review, outside critics gave feedback. Samples were tested with pastors, students, and laypeople. Perhaps no other Bible translation has gone through a more thorough process to ensure accuracy and readability.”4

The Passion Translation has Brian Simmons and his “team” of experts. 

Legitimate Translations

Textual criticism is the process used by scholars to determine what the original manuscripts of the Bible said. The standard among scholars is to use the earliest or most reliable manuscripts when translating Scripture. Sometimes the earliest may not be the most reliable, but those who study textual criticism understand what is needed to properly translate the passages because of their expertise and experience. 

Simmons claims the New Testament may have been written in Aramaic and not in Greek. So much of what Simmons translates is from Aramaic rather than the earlier and more reliable Greek manuscripts. In fact, the earliest Aramaic texts date 500 A.D., while Greek manuscripts date from the first century A.D. Dr. Lional Winsor wrote, “Aramaic was a language spoken in the Eastern Medeterrian. It was common in Seria, Judia, etc. Jesus probably spoke it, and Paul probably knew it too. But nobody thinks that Paul actually wrote Romans in Aramaic. Why would he? Very few people in Rome would have understood it.”2

Simmons has received substantial criticism from respected scholars and theologians concerning his ‘Passion Translation’ and has revised some of his verses. For example, later editions of Galatians 6:6 leave out the ‘transference of anointing.’ Yet, Simmons needs to explain his rewording of multiple passages in such a significant way. Such revisions would at least garner some explanation to his readers, but Simmons offers no justification. 

Is It a Translation?

I know several people who read The Passion Translation, but thankfully, I don’t know anyone who considers it their primary source for Biblical study. I would not recommend it to anyone; if asked, I would suggest they set it aside for a more accurate translation of God’s word. 

Despite the title of ‘The Passion Translation,’ it is not a translation; Simmons admitted he was not a scholar of the original languages.5 So I have to ask, how are you translating if you are not skilled in the languages? Like his revisions, he offers no reasons and Simmons removed this quoted admission on Amazon. Still, the authors of God’s Super-Apostles have a copy of his admission in their possession. And why have subsequent editions of The Passion Translation yet to include any footnotes regarding the changes in the text? And there have been numerous, which I will point out in Part II. 

As a result, in 2022 removed the ‘Passion Translation.’ Biblegateway has over a million monthly visits and is the number one site visited when referencing the Bible. That should tell you something. Bible scholars, including those who translated the NIV, use a more rigorous standard. A new version must closely adhere to its source’s wording, syntax, and structure. Critics of The Passion Translation say it doesn’t meet those standards and functions as a paraphrase while presenting itself as a translation.6

Despite the severe shortcomings of The Passion Translation, it is endorsed by Bill Johnson, Michael W. Smith, John Bevere, and a host of others within the New Apostolic Reformation circles. If you read The Passion Translation, you should be aware it is not a translation, despite claims it is. In Part II, I will give you multiple examples of his translations which should raise some red flags if the above information has not. 

Creative Commons License
Stop! Consider What Is Wrong With The Passion Translation by James W Glazier is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  1. Pivec, Holly. “Important facts about The Passion Translation.” Holly Pivec,, 23 June 2018, [] []
  2. Alisa Childers. “3 Things Christians Should Know About The Passion Translation.” Online video clip. Alisa Childers, 25 October 2020. Web. 24 February 2023. [] []
  3. Wilson, Andrew. “What’s Wrong With The Passion ‘Translation’?” Think Theology,, 6 Wednesday, 2016, []
  4. “About The NIV.” The NIV Bible,, 2023, []
  5. Geivett, Douglas. Pivec, Holly. “NAR Prophets vs. Prophets in the Bible.” God’s Super-Apostles, Weaver Book, 2014. []
  6. Shellnutt, Kate. “Bible Gateway Removes The Passion Translation.” Christianity Today,, 9 February 2022, []

Pin It on Pinterest